Compaison Rails vs. Django


Wed 17 August 2005 By Stefane Fermigier

Rails est un framework web MVC
pour le langage Ruby qui connait une certaine popularité en ce moment.



Django est son plus proche
équivalent dans le monde Python.



Les deux projets sont issus de projets spécifiques (Basecamp pour Rails, Lawrence Journal World pour Django) et
ont été générisés ensuite.



Sam Newman vient d'écrire A
comparison of Django with Rails
, et conclut sa comparaison assez
équilibrée des deux frameworks par:


I said at the start that the two frameworks were developed as a result
of two very different applications - and most of the differences between
the two are a result of this. If you are developing a simple (in a domain
model sense) application where you want to use Ajax to deliver a great
UI,
Rails is probably for you. If however you want to develop an entire site
with different types of applications within it - then Django’s plugable
applications and general approach might be what you’re after. Equally, the
better user and administration side of Django favours portal style
applications – this is something you’ll have to do yourself if you want to
use Rails.


There is scope for both frameworks to learn from each other, and I still
have a question around how well Rails will scale (in terms of the size of
the site, not number of hits) - Django has already proved it is capable of
this with LjWorld.com. Likewise it
will be interesting to see if Django can or even wants to make the use of
Ajax as simple as it is with Rails (although work is already progressing
along these lines), or if the more powerful language features of Ruby will
prove the deciding factor.



Ce qu'il manque à présent, c'est une comparaison avec Zope3...


[Ajouté à 9h44] A lire aussi, une comparaison entre
Python et Ruby
par Ian Bicking.




Category: Product & Development